Saturday, June 21, 2014

What's next in the topic of vaccines?

As was discussed in my last post, vaccines have been a successful part of medical history for over two centuries. Some might go as far to say that they are “among the most effective interventions in the history of the public health” (Koff et al., 2014). With the discovery of each new vaccine, another disease begins to lose its battle against the human race. However, some of those germs that lead to disease are persistent and do whatever they can to attempt to stay one step ahead of current advances. This is evident with cases of influenza. Each year, new strands of influenza are discovered and as a result new influenza vaccines are created and mass-produced for the general public. These influenza germs that we attempt to fight off each year, through the current influenza vaccination, continue to mutate in an effort to withstand the antibodies that are targeted to kill them. Scientists and medical professionals are constantly looking for new ways to combat the viruses among us.

In February of this year, 35 vaccine experts got together in California for the first of a three part meeting series to discuss an innovative approach to vaccines. The driving force bringing this group together was “the need for a new, human immunology-based clinical-research initiative to accelerate the development of new and improved vaccines” due to limitations and challenges that are reached when conducting testing on animals (Koff et al., 2014). This initiative will be known as the “Human Vaccines Project” which hopes to discover a plan to prevent and control major diseases and cancer through vaccines.

According to Koff et al. (2014), this group of experts agreed that the three hindrances to improving today’s vaccines are:

1.     Inadequate understanding of how to generate specific, potent, broad and durable immune responses in humans.
2.     The lack of understanding of the precise antigens needed to elicit protective immunity against intractable pathogens and cancer.
3.     The lack of understanding of how to best optimize vaccine efficacy in populations, ranging from newborns to the elderly.

If these three areas can be overcome, then these scientists believe that our society will be on its way to tackling major diseases and cancer through the use of vaccines. In order to get to their end goal, and once the initial hindrances are overcome, several significant steps will need to be taken. This is where the Human Vaccine Project plays is role. Because animal testing only offers so many scientific results, the idea is to take the testing to the human level. “The group concluded that comprehensive assessments of human responses to licensed and experimental vaccines in rapid, focused and iterative clinical research trials could create novel strategies for the generation of long-lived protective immune responses in humans and thus enable the accelerated development of vaccines against infectious diseases and cancer” (Koff et al., 2014).  Below is a chart that helps to visual the plan constructed by the experts at this recent meeting.

 (Image from www.nature.com)

In theory, this sounds like this is the next step to take, but who would be a willing participant in a study like this?

The next two meetings are scheduled to meet later this year and the early part next year with the project’s implementation date of 2015. The next meeting will discuss the possible organizational structure and its business plan followed by the final meeting, which aims to meet with potential stakeholders, identify funds for the project, and create a desired timeline of milestones.

To view more about the Human Vaccines Project and the grant that is funding it, click here.

For the complete article, “Toward a Human Vaccines Project”, in Nature Immunology, click here to view it.

Reference


Koff, W. C., Gust, I. D., & Plotkin, S. A. (2014, July). Toward a Human Vaccines Project. Nature Immunology, 15, 589-592.

7 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  2. It is hard to argue against the successful eradication of many natural diseases. I believe the author did a great job of presenting both sides the issue. The layout of the blog was easy to read and aesthetically pleasing. To the author, What are the associated risks of the project? Do you believe that these risks justify further development of the technology?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lea,
    That’s a great topic, and very relevant. I liked the current event you chose. I think it is a great idea to have the human vaccine project. I’ve researched animal research and testing, and found that animals don’t make good models for humans. They could even prevent medications or vaccines from being created if a pharmaceutical doesn’t work on an animal, but would have worked for humans. Although, my concern with this project is the safety of the volunteers. However, the vaccines would have probably gone under some in vitro testing before human clinical trials or I would think there would be an ethics issue. So, they might be fine.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Lea,

    Awesome post! While I don't completely agree with it, it does what it's supposed to - discuss a current event about vaccination and its benefits. Vaccination in my opinion is something that isn't a necessity but something that is probably good to take to prevent illnesses. I have known a lot of people (including myself) that have gotten vaccines but have still fallen ill. Likewise, I have also known people (including myself) that have no gotten any vaccines and have not fallen sick. While I think it's important that kids get vaccines as they are more prone to getting ill, I don't necessarily think it's that important. Therefore, I think the experiment goes too far and has too many risks associated with it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lea,
    This is a very great topic because it is so relevant. I believe vaccines are such an important part of the medical care one receives because it protects themselves and others from very harmful viruses. The study is a little extreme. It sounds good in theory but when put to the test I can see where complications can occur. However, it has the potential to yield some very valuable information about vaccines and can be used to even prevent cancer. Very great and informative blog post and I am looking forward to seeing just where this study can take us.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello,

    Great current event! I wonder what limitations they will put on participants? I believe this study is way too extreme and unnecessary. People who are against vaccines live the holistic lifestyle. If this study attracts any attention, it will just be negative since it will frighten others. I also found it interesting how this study idea occurred in California since it is infamous for the many individuals that choose to live a holistic lifestyle. The three limitations explained in your post demonstrate the biggest pot holes. I know that I sound extremely against this idea but none the less I am interested in what the results could be.

    ReplyDelete